Free Encyclopedia of Ecommerce :: Free Encyclopedia of Ecommerce
 

Flashcom Inc

Founded in 1998, Huntington Beach, California-based Flashcom Inc. was one of the first companies to offer digital subscriber line (DSL) service to small businesses and individuals. DSL technology makes use of the copper telephone lines already running from telephone companies into most homes and businesses, allowing recipients continual Internet access at speeds 50 times faster than traditional dial-up modems. DSL also facilitates connections to local area networks (LANs) such as corporate intranets. Unlike dial-up connections, DSL does not interfere with telephone activity. Rather, via the same dedicated line, users can make and receive phone calls and faxes despite the fact that they are always online.

The growth of bandwidth intensive applications, such as Web hosting, video conferencing, and online selling, sparked a demand for faster connections like DSL in the late 1990s. In fact, some analysts predicted that roughly 1.5 million companies would move to DSL connections by 2002. Ironically, the promise of this technology—what prompted Flashcom's founders to create the business—ultimately led to the upstart's demise. Like many other DSL service providers, Flashcom found itself unable to keep pace with the crush of orders it received. In December of 2000, the two-year-old firm filed bankruptcy.

When Flashcom was first established, it began offering DSL services to medium and small businesses in Southern California. The firm's SoloSurfer software was designed for a single workstation, while its MultiSurfer application used a single phone line to offer DSL services to all of those who were connected to a LAN. Touting itself as a full-scale digital solutions provider, Flashcom also sold long-distance services, firewall and other security applications, virtual private networks, and Web site development and hosting. One of the company's first major moves was to allow Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to resell Flashcom's DSL services to their customers. Many smaller ISPs had been unable to offer DSL services, mainly because the equipment to put the technology in place was so costly. Flashcom sought to make its DSL services attractive to the smaller players by having the technology already in place for an ISP to connect directly to its network.

Within months of its founding, Flashcom had expanded its services to major markets in Massachusetts and New York. Its monthly service fee—which included all equipment, e-mail, and round-the-clock Internet access—ranged from $59.95 to $375, depending on connection speed. In December of 1998, Crosspoint Venture Partners agreed to fund a portion of Flashcom's expansion. By then, service also was offered in New Jersey; Connecticut; Illinois; Washington, D.C.; and the Carolinas. A June 1999 agreement with Bell Atlantic allowed the firm to expand further into the Northeast, including major metropolitan markets in Pennsylvania and Maryland. Basic monthly fees were dropped to $49.95, and eventually to $39.95 in some areas. By the end of 1999 Flashcom was servicing more than 25,000 clients in 21 states.

ISP Sonicport.com, operator of the Seeyaonline.com Web portal, began offering Flashcom's DSL services to its clients in January of 2000. Despite difficulties fulfilling customer requests for DSL, Flashcom continued to expand into new markets, where it advertised its services heavily. In February of 2000, a BusinessWeek Online article stated, "underneath the marketing push lie serious customer service problems. . . .very few of those pushing lots of ads come out well—especially Flashcom, which has become something of a flash point of subscriber anger." In fact, although Flashcom was providing DSL service to roughly 15,000 clients, another 15,000 orders had been backlogged. Some pundits likened the dilemma faced by Flashcom and other DSL service providers to the problems American Online encountered in 1997 when demand outstripped the online service provider's technology and customer support capabilities. To counter the negative publicity about its inability to provide service quickly, Flashcom brought in new management and spent millions of dollars overhauling its support infrastructure by increasing customer service staff and improving technical support.

Flashcom raised an additional $84 million from investors such as BancBoston Ventures, Behrman Capital, Capital Research and Management, the Carlyle Group, and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. in April of 2000. According to Flashcom President and CEO Richard Rasmus, as quoted in Business Wire, the fresh capital would be used for "enhancing our back-office system, upgrading and expanding our network and operating facilities, and recruiting the talent needed to deliver a superior and constantly improving customer experience." In spite of its troubles, Flashcom expanded into Wisconsin and inked a technology sharing agreement with Texas Instruments Inc. in June. A month later, the firm acquired managed network services provider Worldwide Axcelerant Group. In October, Flashcom began using Norton Internet Security products to enhance its security capabilities, and Viasource Communications Inc. agreed to handle installation services for a portion of Flashcom's waiting customers. A major layoff took place in November. However, despite these efforts to improve bottom line performance, the firm continued to struggle. Not only had Flashcom's inability to fulfill requests for service quickly alienated a growing base of potential clients, it also had prevented Flashcom from securing potential revenue. In December, Flashcom sold its DSL lines to NorthPoint Communications and filed for bankruptcy.

FURTHER READING:

"ADSL: Flashcom Receives Funding to Accelerate Nationwide Deployment." EDGE, On & About AT&T. December 7, 1998.

April, Carolyn A. "Acquisition: Flashcom Buys Managed Network Service Provider." InfoWorld. July 17, 2000.

Carlson, Caron. "DSL Providers Scramble for Survival." eWeek. December 18, 2000.

"Flashcom and Texas Instruments Join Forces to Simplify Nationwide Delivery of DSL Services." Cambridge Telecom Report. June 5, 2000.

"Flashcom Teams with Bell Atlantic to Broaden High-Speed Internet Access Service Areas in Northeast." Business Wire. June 21, 1999.

"Major Residential Broadband Service Provider Turns to Symantec for Security." Business Wire. October 4, 2000.

Rendleman, John. "DSL Deployments Hitting Snags." PC Week. February 14, 2000.

"Viasource Forms Strategic Relationship with Flashcom for Retail Distribution of Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) Services." PR Newswire. October 16, 2000.

"Wholesale vs. Retail: Who Sells What in High-Speed DSL." BusinessWeek Online. February 17, 2000. Available from www.businessweek.com/smallbiz.

SEE ALSO: Bandwidth; Broadband Technology; Connectivity, Internet; Internet Service Providers (ISPs); Local Area Network (LAN)

Flow [next] [back] Addison Fischer

User Comments Add a comment…

6 months ago

I find it interesting that much of the information in this let the blame fall on Flashcom and the marketing operations. As the network operations manager for Flashcom for much of the time that they were in business, the reality was that the tools to measure a customers "ability" to receive an acceptable connection were provided by the wholesalers (Covad, Northpoint, PacBell, GTE) And these tools proved too inadequate to identify customers who were in fact able to receive DSL.



We were told to sell, given tools to qualify customers, and then we were at the mercy of the LECS to provision and deliver these circuits. Especially in the case of Northpoint, this failed miserably and we were left to blame.



Subsequent to the provisioning problems created by the LECs, the deal with PWC to create a back office system which they had never developed culminated in an epic explosion of excrement when they turned on the switch after 10 months of development only to find that they had no idea what they were doing.



The brains and brawn of Flashcom rose to the challenge, and gave it a great attempt to salvage the company...



In the end, the demise was determined by Northpoint's inability to deliver on lines sold by Flashcom...(I personally handled much of the provisioning for Flashcom lines and know that 55-70K lines were actively provisioned or waiting for turn up) and the utter incompetence of PWC and their developement team who took millions of dollars to provide a world class provisioning, billing, and support system and delivered a solution less valuable than something my dog would do in the back yard...at least that could be used as fertilizer.



Flashcom was built by the directors and department heads who somehow found there way through referrals to this great little company. We lasted through the craziness imposed by the Sach's inept owenership of the company, and we were almost able to survive the tech implosion...but alas, it was not to be.



>The insider<

12 months ago

nice my parents were the founders of flashcom,



its always great to know a little family history





they were the original founders for flashcom



andra and brad sachs